Compare Ansys Fluent and Autodesk CFD 
- Users report that Autodesk CFD excels in fluid analysis with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust capabilities in simulating fluid flow and heat transfer, which reviewers say is particularly beneficial for small businesses looking for effective solutions.
- Reviewers mention that Ansys Fluent, while strong in fluid analysis with a score of 8.9, falls slightly short in finite element analysis, scoring 8.2 compared to Autodesk CFD's 9.1, indicating that Autodesk may offer a more comprehensive suite for users needing both fluid and structural analysis.
- G2 users appreciate Autodesk CFD's ease of use, scoring 8.8, which reviewers say makes it accessible for users with varying levels of expertise, while Ansys Fluent's score of 8.0 suggests a steeper learning curve that some users find challenging.
- Users on G2 highlight Autodesk CFD's superior 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 8.6, stating that features like the intuitive interface and effective editing tools enhance their design workflow, whereas Ansys Fluent's score of 7.8 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk CFD's command clarity, scoring 9.0, significantly contributes to a smoother user experience, while Ansys Fluent's score of 7.9 suggests that users may encounter some confusion with command functions.
- Users say that Autodesk CFD's integration capabilities, scoring 9.0, allow for seamless collaboration with other software, which is a critical feature for small businesses, while Ansys Fluent's score of 8.0 indicates it may not integrate as smoothly with other tools, potentially hindering workflow efficiency.
The ease of building models, and importing files from other design modelers is fantastic. With the acquisition of Fluent , Redhawk, and HFX this software covers all the basic needs and desires that a simulation/design engineer would need. The software can...
It can be glitchy at times and could definitely run faster. Sometimes I find myself waiting for it to load for longer than I would like.
Fastness and accuracy are the two parameters which attracts me
There is a tool which is trying to gain popularity but lacks handling of advanced physics that other competitors can handle. Integration with other generally used softwares seems to be a hindrance
The ease of building models, and importing files from other design modelers is fantastic. With the acquisition of Fluent , Redhawk, and HFX this software covers all the basic needs and desires that a simulation/design engineer would need. The software can...
Fastness and accuracy are the two parameters which attracts me
It can be glitchy at times and could definitely run faster. Sometimes I find myself waiting for it to load for longer than I would like.
There is a tool which is trying to gain popularity but lacks handling of advanced physics that other competitors can handle. Integration with other generally used softwares seems to be a hindrance
