Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Angular Material and PrimeNG

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Angular Material
Angular Material
Star Rating
(51)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Angular Material
PrimeNG
PrimeNG
Star Rating
(19)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PrimeNG
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that PrimeNG excels in ease of use with a score of 9.1, making it a favorite among developers who appreciate its intuitive design and straightforward setup process. In contrast, Angular Material, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower ease of use score at 8.7.
  • Reviewers mention that PrimeNG's component library is robust, scoring 8.8, which includes a wide variety of components like DataTable and Calendar that are highly customizable. Angular Material also scores 8.8 in this area, but some users feel it lacks the same level of flexibility in customization.
  • G2 users highlight that PrimeNG's support quality is rated at 8.1, which some users find lacking in responsiveness compared to Angular Material's support score of 8.4. Reviewers mention that Angular Material's community support is more active, providing quicker resolutions to issues.
  • Users on G2 report that PrimeNG has a lower score of 7.6 for unlocked components, indicating that some features may be limited unless users opt for premium versions. In contrast, Angular Material scores 8.2, with reviewers appreciating the availability of more features without additional costs.
  • Reviewers say that PrimeNG's product direction score of 7.1 indicates some concerns about future updates and enhancements, while Angular Material shines with a score of 9.7, suggesting a strong commitment to ongoing development and feature improvements.
  • Users report that both products integrate well with frameworks, scoring 8.8 for PrimeNG and 8.6 for Angular Material. However, users mention that PrimeNG's integration with Angular is particularly seamless, making it easier to implement in existing projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Angular Material
No pricing available
PrimeNG
No pricing available
Free Trial
Angular Material
No trial information available
PrimeNG
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
38
8.2
14
Ease of Use
8.7
39
9.2
14
Ease of Setup
8.8
16
9.0
7
Ease of Admin
7.8
15
8.8
7
Quality of Support
8.4
36
8.1
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
15
8.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
37
7.3
13
Features by Category
8.5
35
8.5
14
Functionality
8.3
30
8.6
13
8.8
32
8.7
13
8.2
30
7.5
12
Management
8.6
31
8.8
13
8.6
28
8.6
13
8.4
23
8.2
13
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Angular Material
Angular Material
PrimeNG
PrimeNG
Angular Material and PrimeNG are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Angular Material
Angular Material has no unique categories
PrimeNG
PrimeNG has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Angular Material
Angular Material
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
38.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
25.5%
PrimeNG
PrimeNG
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
15.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
52.6%
Reviewers' Industry
Angular Material
Angular Material
Computer Software
38.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.7%
Program Development
4.3%
Financial Services
4.3%
Accounting
4.3%
Other
21.3%
PrimeNG
PrimeNG
Computer Software
21.1%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Accounting
15.8%
Financial Services
10.5%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.3%
Other
31.6%
Most Helpful Reviews
Angular Material
Angular Material
Most Helpful Favorable Review
JC
Jelson C.
Verified User in Computer Software

The simplicity of using the components present in Angular Material is beyond comparison with any other libraries. There are ample components that can be used as well as re-used in various Angular Projects. There are no issues with the compatibility with...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Esha M.
EM
Esha M.
Verified User in Financial Services

Advance topics could have been better. People who are new might find it tough to understand those due to a lack of easy explanation. It is fine though for someone who has experience. I would also recommend maybe have a live compiler attached to every module...

PrimeNG
PrimeNG
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Pawan T.
PT
Pawan T.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Primeng provides more tha ln 70 components with best theming experience. It has lots of rich UI features available like datatable, icons, menu bar, tree, organizational tree etc. It almost completed all my needs I was looking for my application. These are...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Ken S.
KS
Ken S.
Verified User in Computer Software

PrimeNG's templates were not that helpful when I first started using PrimeNG.

Alternatives
Angular Material
Angular Material Alternatives
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Add Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Progress Kendo UI
Progress Kendo UI
Add Progress Kendo UI
DevExpress
DevExpress
Add DevExpress
Material UI
Material UI
Add Material UI
PrimeNG
PrimeNG Alternatives
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Add Syncfusion Essential Studio®
Progress Kendo UI
Progress Kendo UI
Add Progress Kendo UI
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Ionic: An OutSystems Company
Add Ionic: An OutSystems Company
DevExpress
DevExpress
Add DevExpress
Discussions
Angular Material
Angular Material Discussions
Angular Material is not a framework; it is a UI component library for Angular applications.
1 comment
Is angular material better than bootstrap?
1 comment
pramod g.
PG
yes....it is better than bootstrapRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Angular Material has no more discussions with answers
PrimeNG
PrimeNG Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
PrimeNG has no discussions with answers