Compare Angular Material and DevExpress 
- Users report that DevExpress excels in its Component Library, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while Angular Material scores 8.8. Reviewers mention that the extensive range of components available in DevExpress significantly enhances their development speed and flexibility.
- Reviewers say that DevExpress offers superior Quality of Support, with a score of 9.7 compared to Angular Material's 8.4. Users on G2 highlight the responsiveness and helpfulness of DevExpress's support team, which they find crucial for resolving issues quickly.
- G2 users mention that DevExpress's Ease of Setup is a standout feature, scoring 9.3, while Angular Material scores 8.8. Users appreciate the straightforward installation process and the comprehensive documentation provided by DevExpress, making it easier for teams to get started.
- Users say that DevExpress shines in Patching & Updates, with a score of 9.6, indicating a robust system for keeping the software up-to-date. In contrast, Angular Material's update process is perceived as less efficient, leading to some frustration among users.
- Reviewers mention that DevExpress's Customization capabilities score 9.1, allowing for extensive tailoring of components to meet specific needs, whereas Angular Material's customization options are seen as more limited, scoring 8.2. This flexibility is often cited as a key advantage for DevExpress.
- Users on G2 report that DevExpress's Documentation is top-notch, scoring 9.7, which they find invaluable for onboarding and troubleshooting. In comparison, Angular Material's documentation, while helpful, does not reach the same level of detail and clarity, leading to a score of 8.5.
The simplicity of using the components present in Angular Material is beyond comparison with any other libraries. There are ample components that can be used as well as re-used in various Angular Projects. There are no issues with the compatibility with...
Advance topics could have been better. People who are new might find it tough to understand those due to a lack of easy explanation. It is fine though for someone who has experience. I would also recommend maybe have a live compiler attached to every module...
While I use their awesome tools for C# wpf development, and they save me hours and hours of time, the really outstanding aspect of DevExpress is the support they provide. Responses to questions are always very thorough and typically include a code snippet...
The documentation and the support center for the WPF controls feels less complete than the WinForms documentation. While this is probably just my personal impression, I was almost always able to find an answer to a certain problem I had with the WinForms...
The simplicity of using the components present in Angular Material is beyond comparison with any other libraries. There are ample components that can be used as well as re-used in various Angular Projects. There are no issues with the compatibility with...
While I use their awesome tools for C# wpf development, and they save me hours and hours of time, the really outstanding aspect of DevExpress is the support they provide. Responses to questions are always very thorough and typically include a code snippet...
Advance topics could have been better. People who are new might find it tough to understand those due to a lack of easy explanation. It is fine though for someone who has experience. I would also recommend maybe have a live compiler attached to every module...
The documentation and the support center for the WPF controls feels less complete than the WinForms documentation. While this is probably just my personal impression, I was almost always able to find an answer to a certain problem I had with the WinForms...
