- Home
- ...
- Object Storage Solutions
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
- Object storage
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)-vs-Object storage
Compare Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and IBM Cloud Object Storage 
- Users report that Amazon S3 excels in scalability with a score of 9.5, allowing businesses to easily adjust their storage needs as they grow, while IBM Cloud Object Storage, with a lower score of 8.7, may not offer the same level of flexibility for rapidly changing demands.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon S3's versioning feature, rated at 9.0, provides robust data protection by allowing users to recover previous versions of objects, a functionality that users feel is less emphasized in IBM Cloud Object Storage.
- G2 users highlight the speed of access in Amazon S3, scoring 9.2, which is crucial for applications requiring quick data retrieval, whereas IBM Cloud Object Storage's performance in this area is perceived as slower, impacting user experience.
- Users on G2 appreciate Amazon S3's strong encryption capabilities, rated at 9.1, which ensures data security, while IBM Cloud Object Storage, with a score of 8.5, is noted to have less comprehensive encryption options, leading to concerns about data safety.
- Reviewers say that Amazon S3's ease of use, rated at 8.7, is a significant advantage, making it more accessible for users without extensive technical knowledge, compared to IBM Cloud Object Storage, which has a lower ease of use score of 8.0, potentially complicating the onboarding process.
- Users report that Amazon S3's quality of support, with a score of 8.7, is often highlighted as a strong point, providing timely assistance, while IBM Cloud Object Storage's support, rated at 8.0, is seen as less responsive, which can be a critical factor for businesses needing immediate help.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
The initial set up for AWS was a little difficult, especially if you have limited experience spinning up a cloud computing infrastructure. It took about half of a day for us to get users the proper information they needed and for us to understand the...
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
I dislike the fact that there is always constant threats and vulnerabilities to think about when using the cloud based database.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
The foremost thing in the minds of users in a cloud environment is security and IBM helps deliver this alongside its hosting services perfectly. Also having servers to in a cloud environment powered by IBM is very time and cost effective.
The initial set up for AWS was a little difficult, especially if you have limited experience spinning up a cloud computing infrastructure. It took about half of a day for us to get users the proper information they needed and for us to understand the...
I dislike the fact that there is always constant threats and vulnerabilities to think about when using the cloud based database.
