- Home
- ...
- Object Storage Solutions
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
- Azure Blob Storage
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)-vs-Azure Blob Storage
Compare Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and Azure Blob Storage 
- Users report that Amazon S3 excels in scalability, with a score of 9.5, allowing businesses to easily manage growing data needs. Reviewers mention that its ability to handle large volumes of data seamlessly is a significant advantage for enterprise-level applications.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Blob Storage offers superior ease of use, scoring 9.1 compared to S3's 8.7. Users appreciate the intuitive interface and straightforward setup process, making it a preferred choice for teams with less technical expertise.
- G2 users highlight Amazon S3's robust versioning feature, scoring 9.0, which allows users to keep track of changes and recover previous versions of files easily. This is particularly beneficial for teams that require strict data management and compliance.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Blob Storage provides better auditing capabilities, although it scored slightly lower at 8.2 compared to S3's 8.5. Reviewers mention that the auditing features help maintain compliance and track data access effectively.
- Reviewers say that both platforms offer strong security features, but Azure Blob Storage edges out with a score of 9.2 for encryption, which users find essential for protecting sensitive data in the cloud.
- Users report that Amazon S3's redundancy features, scoring 9.0, are highly praised for ensuring data durability and availability, making it a reliable choice for businesses that cannot afford data loss.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
Nothing really. It keeps improving and solving issues.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
Nothing really. It keeps improving and solving issues.
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
