When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) overall.
AWS RDS is one of the best options for cloud database that I have used so far. My primary use is with the MySQL version and it works incredibly well and make DR/HA dead simple with the simplicity of setting up read replicas. Its also incredibly performant...
That's it's not serverless, though there is dynamo DB but RDS has it's own advantages over Dynamo DB.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
The complexity involved in creating the s3 buckes which introduces data leaks. The options are not clearly layed out. Also, the pricing.
AWS RDS is one of the best options for cloud database that I have used so far. My primary use is with the MySQL version and it works incredibly well and make DR/HA dead simple with the simplicity of setting up read replicas. Its also incredibly performant...
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
That's it's not serverless, though there is dynamo DB but RDS has it's own advantages over Dynamo DB.
The complexity involved in creating the s3 buckes which introduces data leaks. The options are not clearly layed out. Also, the pricing.