- Home
- ...
- Content Delivery Network (CDN) Software
- CloudFront
- Azure Content Delivery Network
- CloudFront-vs-Azure Content Delivery Network
Compare Amazon CloudFront and Azure Content Delivery Network 
- Users report that Amazon CloudFront excels in SSL support with a score of 9.1, while Azure Content Delivery Network received a lower score of 8.6. Reviewers mention that the ease of setting up SSL certificates is a significant advantage for CloudFront, making it a preferred choice for businesses prioritizing security.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Content Delivery Network shines in dynamic content routing with a score of 9.0 compared to CloudFront's 8.6. Users on G2 appreciate Azure's ability to efficiently manage and deliver dynamic content, which is crucial for applications requiring real-time data updates.
- Users say that Amazon CloudFront's administration console is rated at 8.6, providing a user-friendly interface for managing settings and configurations. In contrast, Azure's console received a score of 8.2, with some reviewers noting that it can be less intuitive, which may affect the overall user experience.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon CloudFront has a superior score of 9.1 for static content caching, which is essential for websites with a lot of static assets. Reviewers mention that this feature significantly improves load times and overall performance, making it a strong contender for businesses focused on speed.
- Users report that Azure Content Delivery Network offers better reporting capabilities, scoring 8.2 compared to CloudFront's 7.6. Reviewers mention that the detailed analytics provided by Azure help businesses make informed decisions about their content delivery strategies.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon CloudFront has a higher overall satisfaction rating with a G2 score of 4.4, compared to Azure's 3.8. Users on G2 express that CloudFront's reliability and performance have made it a trusted partner for their content delivery needs.
Cloudfront offers incredible speed on a worldly scale(Cloudfront and S3 are on all major continents). The ability for the user to tweak content settings - both for static and streaming content - allows for unlimited possibilities with regard to content...
- It's very complicated to set up and to deploy something on top of it. - It's not user friendly - All the components of CloudFront are distributed across various AWS Services. - Pricing is higher as compared to other CDNs - You can't add custom response...
Its inexpensive; comes with pay as as yo go options to choose from, easy to set up and use, easily integrates to Azure and other services, helps to reduce load time of apps hence saving data bandwidth, great customer support, offers regular insights and...
billing is confusing and limited in options
Cloudfront offers incredible speed on a worldly scale(Cloudfront and S3 are on all major continents). The ability for the user to tweak content settings - both for static and streaming content - allows for unlimited possibilities with regard to content...
Its inexpensive; comes with pay as as yo go options to choose from, easy to set up and use, easily integrates to Azure and other services, helps to reduce load time of apps hence saving data bandwidth, great customer support, offers regular insights and...
- It's very complicated to set up and to deploy something on top of it. - It's not user friendly - All the components of CloudFront are distributed across various AWS Services. - Pricing is higher as compared to other CDNs - You can't add custom response...
billing is confusing and limited in options
