Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare ActiveBatch and JAMS

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(208)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatch
JAMS
JAMS
Star Rating
(196)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.4% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Learn more about JAMS
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that JAMS Enterprise Job Scheduler excels in workflow automation with a score of 9.5, highlighting its ability to streamline complex processes effectively, while ActiveBatch Workload Automation, with a score of 9.2, is noted for its robust workflow management capabilities.
  • Reviewers mention that JAMS offers superior error alerts functionality, scoring 9.3, which helps users quickly identify and resolve issues, whereas ActiveBatch's score of 9.0 indicates a solid but slightly less responsive alert system.
  • G2 users highlight JAMS' strong quality of support with a score of 9.5, often praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while ActiveBatch's support, rated at 8.9, is considered good but not as consistently praised.
  • Users on G2 report that ActiveBatch shines in integrations, scoring 9.1, with many reviewers appreciating its seamless connectivity with third-party applications, while JAMS, with a score of 8.3, is seen as having fewer integration options.
  • Reviewers mention that JAMS provides excellent job scheduling features, scoring 9.4, which users find intuitive and effective for managing tasks, while ActiveBatch leads slightly with a score of 9.6, noted for its advanced scheduling capabilities.
  • Users say that ActiveBatch's intelligent automation features, scoring 9.1, are particularly beneficial for organizations looking to enhance efficiency, while JAMS, with a score of 8.6, is seen as less advanced in this area, focusing more on traditional automation methods.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about ActiveBatch
JAMS
30 day free trial
Free Trial
Learn more about JAMS
Free Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
JAMS
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
159
9.1
151
Ease of Use
8.8
156
8.7
151
Ease of Setup
8.4
107
8.6
116
Ease of Admin
8.7
99
8.7
93
Quality of Support
8.9
151
9.5
147
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
97
9.3
91
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
145
9.4
145
Features by Category
9.1
104
8.7
133
Automation
9.4
93
9.0
130
9.0
87
9.0
116
9.1
53
Feature Not Available
Administration
9.0
91
8.5
126
9.2
85
8.5
113
8.9
71
8.5
100
8.9
50
Feature Not Available
9.1
55
8.8
63
9.1
48
9.0
58
Functionality
9.5
96
9.3
121
8.7
72
8.5
93
9.1
46
8.4
55
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Managed File Transfer (MFT)Hide 26 FeaturesShow 26 Features
8.8
64
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.9
32
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
43
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
37
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
32
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
42
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
43
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.9
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.9
32
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
32
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.9
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Warehouse AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
9.2
25
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
20
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
17
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
21
Not enough data
9.4
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
JAMS
JAMS
ActiveBatch and JAMS are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
JAMS
JAMS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
42.7%
JAMS
JAMS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
46.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
34.0%
Reviewers' Industry
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Information Technology and Services
17.5%
Financial Services
17.0%
Hospital & Health Care
7.8%
Insurance
6.8%
Banking
6.3%
Other
44.7%
JAMS
JAMS
Financial Services
18.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Insurance
6.2%
Banking
5.2%
Computer Software
4.6%
Other
57.7%
Most Helpful Reviews
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Jonathan J.
JJ
Jonathan J.
Verified User in Banking

The jobs library is awesome. It provides a great variety of low-code automation steps. Being able to mix and match job steps from different library modules is really powerful. For example, we use the Active Directory, File System and Flow Control job...

Most Helpful Critical Review
AA
alex a.
Verified User in Financial Services

Numerous bugs and support. Managed file transfer is very buggy and does not work as expected. I've opened at least two tickets that were not resolved and I eventually put on hold as I found an alternative work around and don't have time to wait for the...

JAMS
JAMS
Most Helpful Favorable Review
MG
Mark G.
Verified User

JAMS Job Scheduler is one of the most helpful programs that I use. There are so many programs that must be run at specific times, and in specific order and JAMS does it all!

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Insurance

Being Java expert, hard to setup the job due to tightly coupled with windows OS and video tutorials are very high level to know what is the tool about. Without taking tech support this tool is of no use.

Alternatives
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Alternatives
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
Progress MOVEit
Progress MOVEit
Add Progress MOVEit
Cleo Integration Cloud
Cleo
Add Cleo Integration Cloud
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Add PagerDuty
JAMS
JAMS Alternatives
Stonebranch
Stonebranch
Add Stonebranch
Control-M
Control-M
Add Control-M
Automic Automation
Automic Automation
Add Automic Automation
RunMyJobs
RunMyJobs
Add RunMyJobs
Discussions
ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 comment
Katti W.
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 comment
Nazeer A.
NA
Translate: "create a log file instead of having active batch manage it," Translation: "a log file is created instead of being managed by the active batch."Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
JAMS
JAMS Discussions
How to hold schedules of all the jobs ?
2 comments
Adrian C.
AC
JAMS has the option to use jobs to execute other jobs in a specific order, which allows you to hold schedules for all jobs.Read more
Can JAMS convert my existing batch jobs?
2 comments
Official Response from JAMS
Yes. Conversion utilities for Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Server Agent, and Cron are included with JAMS.Read more
What is a JAMS Job?
2 comments
Rob G.
RG
A JAMS job is a description of a task that needs to be executed. It can be initiated by the presence of a file in a specific place, the receipt of an email,...Read more