Compare Abaqus and Creo Simulation 
- Users report that Abaqus excels in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, while Creo Simulation slightly outperforms it with a score of 9.0, indicating that users find Creo's capabilities in this area to be more robust and effective for complex simulations.
- Reviewers mention that Creo Simulation offers superior 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 9.0 compared to Abaqus's 6.4. This suggests that users appreciate Creo's intuitive interface and advanced modeling features, which enhance their design workflow.
- G2 users highlight that Creo Simulation's manufacturing process simulation received a high score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for users focused on optimizing manufacturing workflows, whereas Abaqus scored 8.0 in this area, indicating room for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that the ease of use for Creo Simulation is significantly higher, with a score of 8.7 compared to Abaqus's 7.5. This suggests that users find Creo more user-friendly, which can lead to quicker onboarding and productivity.
- Reviewers mention that Abaqus has a strong reputation for fluid analysis, scoring 8.2, but Creo Simulation closely follows with a score of 8.1, indicating that both products are competent in this area, though Abaqus may have a slight edge.
- Users say that the command clarity in Creo Simulation is rated at 8.8, which is higher than Abaqus's 8.6, suggesting that users find Creo's commands more straightforward and easier to understand, enhancing their overall experience with the software.
Abaqus is great in terms of the options available for computer-aided finite element analysis and the various modules (mechanical, thermal, vibration, fluid, acoustic etc.). The new topology optimization tool TOSCA is great. The level of control available in...
1. The user interface is not friendly, e.g., CAD section, assembly section, visualization menus, export options, and etc. I would say Abaqus is very difficult to learn and work with. 2. The tutorial is also confusing for starters. I personally used YouTube...
It is an ideal tool for the oil industry, it gives me the best to create designs, I love it because I can make changes in real time and I can observe the changes automatically. It is an ideal software because it is the best I have used in CAD, I think that...
It’s still not as powerful as a stand-alone Finite element analysis tool
Abaqus is great in terms of the options available for computer-aided finite element analysis and the various modules (mechanical, thermal, vibration, fluid, acoustic etc.). The new topology optimization tool TOSCA is great. The level of control available in...
It is an ideal tool for the oil industry, it gives me the best to create designs, I love it because I can make changes in real time and I can observe the changes automatically. It is an ideal software because it is the best I have used in CAD, I think that...
1. The user interface is not friendly, e.g., CAD section, assembly section, visualization menus, export options, and etc. I would say Abaqus is very difficult to learn and work with. 2. The tutorial is also confusing for starters. I personally used YouTube...
It’s still not as powerful as a stand-alone Finite element analysis tool
