Compare 3D Slicer and Invivo5 
3D Slicer vs Invivo5
- 3D Slicer and Invivo5 both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that 3D Slicer is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of 3D Slicer over Invivo5.
I use Slicer3D for segmenting CMR images. I like the software is flexible, open-source, and offers several options for image processing. I like it allows to prepare scenes and exploit visualization tools for highlighting specific regions.
This software doesn't support PIS ( patient-specific implant designing) and you can not generate Mesh(Tetrahedral/Hexahedral and mixed ). the software also gets freeze when you import large datasets and it doesn't have multiple export formats.
the software is nice, there are a bunch of options and it does what it's designed to do
The software sometimes does not work on some devices. specially when bundled with the files
I use Slicer3D for segmenting CMR images. I like the software is flexible, open-source, and offers several options for image processing. I like it allows to prepare scenes and exploit visualization tools for highlighting specific regions.
the software is nice, there are a bunch of options and it does what it's designed to do
This software doesn't support PIS ( patient-specific implant designing) and you can not generate Mesh(Tetrahedral/Hexahedral and mixed ). the software also gets freeze when you import large datasets and it doesn't have multiple export formats.
The software sometimes does not work on some devices. specially when bundled with the files
