Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Selenium WebDriver
Show rating breakdown
Save to My Lists
Unclaimed
Unclaimed

Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users value the wide language support in Selenium WebDriver, enhancing flexibility across diverse development teams. (5 mentions)
Users value the efficiency of automation with Selenium WebDriver, significantly reducing manual effort and errors. (4 mentions)
Users value the browser compatibility of Selenium WebDriver, enabling seamless testing across various web browsers effortlessly. (4 mentions)
Users find Selenium WebDriver to be easy to understand, even for those with minimal programming knowledge. (3 mentions)
Users find Selenium WebDriver easy to use, enabling efficient automation and reducing manual effort significantly. (3 mentions)
Users face challenges due to the lack of automation for mobile apps, leading to reliance on other tools. (4 mentions)
Users often experience compatibility issues with browser versions, affecting the stability and success of their automation tests. (3 mentions)
Users face integration issues with Selenium WebDriver, requiring additional tools and causing compatibility problems with browser versions. (3 mentions)
Users find UI testing challenging with Selenium WebDriver, especially without the robot framework, increasing initial setup time. (1 mentions)
Users find UI testing difficult with Selenium WebDriver, especially without the robot framework and initial setup time. (1 mentions)

Top Rated Selenium WebDriver Alternatives

Flutter
(65)
4.6 out of 5
Material UI
(30)
4.5 out of 5

93 Selenium WebDriver Reviews

The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
Search reviews
Hide FiltersMore Filters
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
93 Selenium WebDriver Reviews
4.5 out of 5
93 Selenium WebDriver Reviews
4.5 out of 5

Selenium WebDriver Pros and Cons

How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cons
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Computer Software
UC
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Selenium WebDriver?

It is a easy to script testing tool. With easy Maintaining for testing of software. It have various inbuilt utilities which a user can experience easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Selenium WebDriver?

It is not used widely as Java binding selenium. As per Java it is less documented and usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
UH
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Selenium WebDriver?

Short syntax of Python

Selenium has good community in python to as it makes easy for many novice people who can learn python very easily compare to other OOP language Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Selenium WebDriver?

Indentation of Python function and methods. For python Selenium doesn’t have rich documention like Java Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Banking
CB
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Selenium WebDriver?

Is very useful for the automation of test case in the most used web browsers. Is very simple automate test cases using Python Selenium. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Selenium WebDriver?

I had have some problems automating web pages developed with Polymer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.