IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Pros and Cons

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Ease to use, no programming, many functionalities included, excellent ESB, full integration to any software. Flexible to create any business process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The development of user interfaces and tasks (CAF) are not so friendly sometimes, depend on the functionality we are looking to implement. Deliver a complete solution with Low-code development tools or DPA (Dynamic Process Automation) to improve UX. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Consume and provider. Easy to create a connoters Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Not much, Mostly we have to use go with CI/CD approach. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The SAG webMethods is helped us to stay connected and innovative. The webMethods documentations are precise to understand. For beginners, those documents are beneficial to set up the environments and to debug the ongoing issues with the help of the SAG support team and documentations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Integrating with other cloud services and complex to set up the trial versions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Capacity to transform digital initiatives, SaS applications and IoT devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Integrate third-party applications for new functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Interoperability and ease of development. Here ease of development doesn't compromised with capabilities and this product has a full stack of functionalities across board.

Enterprise support from Software AG is also best in class. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

There are particularly no downsize using Integratoin server. However, HTTP 2.0 support is missing. However this is more with Java version limitation. Workaround are there that can be used though. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The ease of development is unmatchable and the Monitoring of Transaction, Trasaction management, security, Xml support, EDI and B2B is so much mature it cannot be by any other product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The main Drawback is the Complexity of CI/CD. The CI/CD process in any other integration tool is very simple and straight forward while in webMethods its extremely complex and difficult to implement.

Another thing is the release of new version every 6months. To be frank its ridiculous to see so many versions coming up so fast. Its good to release new additions in product but that can also be added as patch instead of new release every 6months.

Another thing to highlight is the access to empower for senior resources in the industry who has worked on product for more than 10-12 years and they are working on different product just because of lack of opportunities in their location and lack of access to advanced kebd articles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The integration capability with the other languages like type scripting and angular codes is the most promising feature of the webMethods servers.

Reduced integration costs and development time.

Increased business agility.

Better end-to-end visibility across systems.

Very flexibly integrates with enterprise application integration into SAP systems, Oracle, MS SQL, and many others.

comprised of all aspects of ESB.

We can arrange data caching and look at the solid-state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant caching and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.

It has enabled us to integrate some systems which needed a form of translation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

IDE can be made more user friendly by improving the mapping patterns.

It doesn't represent OOP very well.

We recommend a better dashboard and analytics features to be incorporated.

It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Connecting different applications and interpretating data. Configuration is d highlight (easy to understand) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Software AG Suite is little complex in nature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

After sharing all our logs, SAG expertise expected this might be an issue. The support person shared some of the guidances to solve the issue step by step, that make an best to solve the problem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

Sometimes we have to wait for responses via email. It may take some time.

If there is a chat option, it would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about webMethods EntireX?

Entirex helped the mainframe team and Java development team to work almost independently Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about webMethods EntireX?

Documentations were not much when we used the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.