IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Pros and Cons

What do you like best about IBM webMethods B2B?

Good Load balancing.Easy to use Graphical user Interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods B2B?

Nothing Much to dislike from integration point of view. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

WebMethods Optimize aids me with continuous monitoring of my client's integration server activities in my organization. It offers highly efficient real-time insights into the performance and hosting status of the deployed server. This helps me with the reduction of infrastructure management cost as its alerts are highly proactive and notify even if there is a slight possibility for the defect to occur in the server well ahead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

WebMethods Optimize gives me up-to-the-minute real-time status updates of the established infrastructure. Dislike is none regarding the integration solutions that it offers for my business needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Service portal is very friendly,

Support persons are very helpful in resolving the issues.

we used Integration Server for this ticket.

Support people are so vigilent and taken care throught out the time of the resolvance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

In Support portal, sometimes OS field is not getting populated so it is wasting our time.

Ticket allocation is not proper and getting delayed and therefore impacting the business.

Customer care support should be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

It's good for Business Enterprise solutions, Business Integration, Analytics & Business support services Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The demo part needs to be improved as not many details were provided during that & need to be more customer-centric. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods API Management?

It is basically an API portal used to expose APIs to external developers or partners securely . What I most like is it supports both SOAP an REST services and also we can securely onboard customers as well Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods API Management?

The UI looks a bit complex as compared to other developer portals but rest everything is pretty good and I am enjoying using it and it provides a great service Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about webMethods EntireX?

Loopback of the Auto Messaging to ensure that the messages sent a delivered. It Also has Native TCP/IP Support which enables network engineer to deploy the application in legacy end devices as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about webMethods EntireX?

IBLM, Oracle & Bizflow has better auto messaging system integrated with the copyrighted tools. UI Development is still on-going to make the user experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods API Management?

- Ease of Use : Someone with basic understanding of the APIs can easily understand and start working on the API Gateway. Comparitively I found the configurations quite intuitive.

- Separate threat protection layer : The product comes in 2 flavors, standard edition gateway and an advanced edition gateway. Standard edition is just a threat protection layer which can address various threat protection requirements while advanced gateway provides rich set of features for API Gateway configuration.

- Analytics : The product ships with a built-in Kibana that addresss the analytics requirements

- Access control made easy : Access control to each API can be controlled in a variety of ways, and they are all quite intuitive. This makes access control hassle free. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods API Management?

- Heavy weight : From resource requirement perspective, it has reasonable high resource requirements which makes it not a first choice when it comes to deployment along with microservices. SoftwareAG has a micro gateway offering to address such requirements, but they fall short when it comes to features they offer Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

Given that the product is known to be a very great product what sets them apart is their customer support. Very knowledgeable and responsive.

This what makes it best and recommendable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

the production is very robust and can handle a complex situations. However, at times even learning can be complex as well. I have review /POC competitor product and iI feel they are much easier to learn. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods B2B?

One place to manage all the transfers et Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods B2B?

Few of the areas like partitioning bit complex Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like best about IBM webMethods Integration?

The tool gives us the freedom to write Connectors the way we want. We don't have to take all the functionalities of an application in middleware to use one API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Integration?

The tool takes a lot of space in the computer, and installation is heavy. Also, the content available for free is not enough for someone new to Cloudstreams. Youtube videos can be more detailed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.