Generated from real user reviews
After trying a few AI code review tools, we chose as a team to buy CodeRabbit. My team has told me it helps with catching bugs, poor code quality, and this can really help be the first round of code review, saving time for people on our team Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I would like a way to adjust how much text is outputted, so we can set the verboseness to our needs as a startup Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Ease of setup is superb, but the top reason for use is it's code suggestions. I've gotten suggestions pointing out failure to follow SOLID principles (and how to fix it), framework specific enhancements, and readability improvements. All of which I have implemented when they were suggested. CodeRabbit does an examplary job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have been using CodeRabbit for four months now and have not found anything I dislike about it. It's so easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Ease of install, operation and handling by any team member - quick help and replies by both community and their team on discord - engaging trial period Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Can seem overly extensive when using for the first time and trying to unfold all findings and recommendations. (Tip; their folded for a reason, trust the process). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The rabbit is a great first pad reviewer for catching typos, simple logical errors, and general good/best-ish practices. It's usually quite good, but can make some inaccurate suggestions, so don't blindly accept and merge. Also, it's great fun to argue with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We're fairly new to the rabbit, so can't disparage it about anything yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.